Monthly Archive for September, 2009

Introduction

Background

[6.] The last UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) was completed in 2008. This was the sixth in a series of assessments that started with the Research Selectivity Exercise conducted by the University Grants Committee in 1986. The purpose of the exercises was to provide authoritative and comprehensible quality ratings for research in all disciplines carried out in universities and colleges across the UK, to inform the UK higher education (HE) funding bodies’ allocation of grant for research. It reflected the established policy of the UK Government, devolved administrations and funding bodies: that these resources should be allocated selectively according to research quality. The exercises also had important roles in providing information and benchmarks – both for the public and as management information within universities and colleges – and to provide accountability for public expenditure on research in HE.

[7.] In December 2006 the Department for Education and Skills announced that a new framework for research assessment and funding would replace the RAE after the 2008 exercise in England. The underlying policy of allocating research funding selectively on the basis of quality remained unchanged; the intention was that the mechanisms should become simpler and less burdensome.

[8.] Since 2007 there has been substantial development work on the new arrangements, now known as the Research Excellence Framework (REF). This work has been led by HEFCE, working in partnership with the other UK HE funding bodies, and overseen by a UK steering group. In this document therefore, ‘we’ refers to all of the UK HE funding bodies unless otherwise specified.

[9.] In late 2007 we held initial consultations on key elements of the REF1, and in May 2008, HEFCE announced a number of changes to those initial proposals, responding to feedback from the sector2.
[1. These proposals were based on a metrics-driven approach for the science-based disciplines, and the use of light-touch expert review for the arts, humanities and social sciences. For further information, see HEFCE 2007/34, HEFCW W07/48HE and SFC/06/2007C.
2. The main change was to move away from separate approaches for the science-based and for the other disciplines, and to develop a unified approach across all disciplines. This was announced in HEFCE Circular letter 13/2008 and in HEFCW W08/20HE and SFC/34/2008.]

[10.] In developing our proposals we have taken into account the UK Government’s aims for the publicly funded research sector and its expectations as to the role that the REF should play in delivering these. The Government has made plain its view that maintaining the capacity of the HE sector to produce world-leading research across a broad range of academic disciplines is essential to underpin economic growth and national well-being; and that to this end the HE sector can and should do more to ensure that its excellent research achieves its full potential impact. The devolved administrations have expressed broadly similar views.

[11.] In his letter of 22 January 2009 to the HEFCE Chair about funding for 2009-10, the Secretary of State emphasised that the REF should take better account of the impact research makes on the economy and society, and gave further guidance on particular activities that the REF should encourage:

‘The REF should continue to incentivise research excellence, but also reflect the quality of researchers’ contribution to public policy making and to public engagement, and not create disincentives to researchers moving between academia and the private sector.’

[12.] It remains the funding bodies’ aim that the REF should provide a unified UK-wide framework for research quality assessment, recognising that decisions on funding allocations will be taken by each funding body for its own country or territory. In particular:

[a.] In Wales, the Welsh Assembly Government is requiring higher education institutions (HEIs) to increasingly align their activities with its key policy directions and ambitions for economic growth. In so doing it recognises that Welsh research must continue to stand comparison with that in the rest of the UK and internationally.

[b.] In Scotland, the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) has yet to take a position on the use of the REF to inform funding.

[c.] In Northern Ireland the Department for Employment and Learning (DEL) is committed to maintaining a UK-wide quality assessment regime; the way in which assessment outcomes will be used for funding purposes will be determined by DEL following consultation with the Northern Ireland HE sector.

[13.] This document sets out proposals for the REF and invites responses to the questions at Annex A.

Aims of research assessment

[14.] The UK funding bodies each aim to develop and sustain a dynamic and internationally competitive research sector in their country or territory that makes a major contribution to economic prosperity, national wellbeing and the expansion and dissemination of knowledge. Research assessment is a key means through which we pursue this strategic aim. In particular, the policy aim of research assessment is to secure the continuation of a world-class, dynamic and responsive research base across the full academic spectrum within HE. This will be achieved through:

- funding: selective funding allocations informed by quality assessment

- benchmarking and information: establishing reputational yardsticks

- accountability: demonstrating that investment in research is effective and delivers public benefits.

[15.] To this end, the REF as a framework for assessment – and for funding where adopted – will aim to:

[a.] Drive up quality across the HE research base and in all forms of research.

[b.] Support and encourage innovative and curiosity-driven research, including new approaches, new fields and interdisciplinary work.

[c.] Reward and encourage the effective sharing, dissemination and application of research findings and the productive interchange of research staff and ideas between HEIs, business and other research users.

[d.] Reward and encourage HEIs that deliver benefits to business, the economy and society by building on excellent research.

[e.] Produce and publish quality assessments that are comprehensible, produced by a transparent process, and benchmarked against international standards and which identify the very best HE research wherever this is carried out.

[f.] Support better management and sustainability of the research base.

Development of the REF

[16.] Following the initial consultation exercise that ended in spring 2008 (HEFCE 2007/34), HEFCE, in collaboration with the other UK HE funding bodies, developed proposals for the REF through a programme of work including:

[a.] A substantive pilot of bibliometrics indicators of research quality, as a significant new element in the framework.

[b.] Considering lessons learned from the 2008 RAE.

[c.] Convening Expert Advisory Groups (EAGs) to draw on advice of senior practising researchers from across the range of disciplines, research users and other funders.

[d.] A wide range of discussions, including with institutions, representative bodies, learned societies, research users and other research funders.

[e.] Workshops on key issues including impact, accountability burden and research information management.

[f.] Consultancy advice, including on approaches to assessing impact in other countries.

[17.] We have worked closely with the UK Research Councils to ensure that our proposals for the REF will be effective in pursuing shared objectives with them, particularly in terms of rewarding excellent research and its impact. Both the Research Councils and the UK HE funding bodies believe that the REF will complement the work of the Research Councils in a way that strengthens the operation of the dual-support research funding system. We remain in continued dialogue with them, including about the scope for better coordination of our respective data collection requirements.

[18.] Reports and documents from the development work that have provided the evidence base for our proposals are available on the web at www.hefce.ac.uk/ref. These are listed at Annex B.

[19.] We are grateful to members of the EAGs who gave of their time to provide constructive advice, and to the considerable efforts of the HEIs that took part in the bibliometrics pilot exercise.

Proposals

[20.] The sections below set out our proposals for:

- defining research excellence and the key features of the assessment framework

- assessing the quality of research outputs – including the use of citation information

- assessing the impact of research on the economy and society

- assessing the research environment

- the overall outcomes of the assessment

- the configuration of panels and units of assessment (UOAs), and how to achieve appropriate levels of consistency between these measures to promote equalities and diversity

- the timetable for implementation of the REF

- the accountability burden implications of the REF.

[21.] We invite responses to questions on each of these sections. Questions are presented throughout the text. Responses to the consultation should be made by completing and returning the form at Annex A. Respondents should complete the electronic version of the form, which can be found on the HEFCE web-site www.hefce.ac.uk, alongside this document under Publications, and e-mail it by midday on Wednesday 16 December 2009.

[22.] All responses should be e-mailed to ref@hefce.ac.uk. In addition:

[a.] Responses from institutions in Scotland should be copied to Pauline Jones, Scottish Funding Council, e-mail pjones@sfc.ac.uk.

[b.] Responses from institutions in Wales should be copied to Linda Tiller, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, e-mail linda.tiller@hefcw.ac.uk.

[c.] Responses from institutions in Northern Ireland should be copied to the Department for Employment and Learning, e-mail research.branch@delni.gov.uk.

Executive Summary

Purpose

[1.] This document sets out proposals for the Research Excellence Framework (REF) – the new arrangements for the assessment and funding of research in UK higher education institutions (HEIs) that will replace the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE).

Key points

[2.] Following an initial consultation on the REF published in late 2007 (HEFCE 2007/34), we have developed detailed proposals for the REF. The proposals build on a pilot exercise on the use of citation information, consideration of how to assess the impact of research as a key new element in the framework, lessons drawn from the 2008 RAE, and extensive expert advice and discussions with a wide range of stakeholders.

[3.] This document sets out proposals for all key aspects of the REF. A summary of the proposals is available in the leaflet ‘The Research Excellence Framework: a brief guide to the proposals’ (shortly to be made available on the web at www.hefce.ac.uk/ref).

[4.] We invite responses from HEIs and other groups and organisations with an interest in the conduct, quality, funding or use of research. This includes businesses, industry representatives, government and public sector bodies, charities and other third sector, social and cultural organisations.

Action required

[5.] Responses to the consultation should be made by completing and returning the form at Annex A by e-mail (see paragraph 21) by midday on Wednesday 16 December 2009.

Footnotes

1 Skills Needs and Training Supply for Career Guidance – a Gap Analysis Prepared for LifelongLearning UK (LLUK) & UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES) by TBR, 21st July 2009.

2 DCSF ‘Youth Matters: Next Steps’ (March 2006) http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/ everychildmatters/Youth/youthmatters/youthmatters/

3 DCSF ‘Youth Matters’ Green Paper (July 2005) looked into how services for young people could be reformed to produce a coherent and integrated system of support http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/Youth/youthmatters/youthmatters/

4 DCSF IAG Quality Standards October 2007 http://www.cegnet.co.uk/files/ CEGNET0001/ManagingCEG/QualityStandardsforIAG/quality_standards_young_people.pdf

5 McGowan, A., Watts, A.G. & Andrews, D. (2009). Local Variations: a Follow-Up Study of New Arrangements for Connexions/Careers/IAG Services for Young People in England. Reading CfBT Education Trust.

6 Watts, A.G. (2008). The partnership model for careers education and guidance: rise, decline – and fall? Career Research and Development, 20, 4-8.

7 A response to a parliamentary question in June 2008; for more information see McGowan et al. (2009 )p. 20

8 http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/stem/

9 EEBM www.etechb.co.uk

10 DfES The National Framework for Careers Education and Guidance in England 11-19 (2003) http://dev.cegnet.co.uk/resource/content/files/651.pdf

11 Barnes, A & Andrews, D (1995). Developing Careers Education and Guidance in the Curriculum, p.6, London, David Fulton.

12 DfES The National Framework for Careers Education and Guidance in England 11-19 (2003) http://dev.cegnet.co.uk/resource/content/files/651.pdf

13 The Panel on Fair Access to the Professions (July 2009) http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/work_areas/accessprofessions.aspx

14 Rathbone/Nuffield Review Engaging Youth Enquiry (October 2008) http://www.nuffield14-19review.org.uk/files/documents196-1.pdf

15 Increasing higher education participation amongst disadvantaged young people and schools in poor communities. The Sutton Trust, October 2008. http://www.suttontrust.com/reports/NCEE_interim_report.pdf

16 Parents Perceptions of SET Based Careers (July 2005) http://www.etechb.co.uk/research/reports/perceptions.cfm

17 EEBM www.etechb.co.uk

18 Watts, A.G. (2008). The partnership model for careers education and guidance: rise, decline – and fall? Career Research and Development, 20, 4-8.

19 Watts, A.G. (2009). Careers Wales; a Review in an International Perspective. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.

20 DCSF IAG strategy is now due for release in the Autumn 2009 http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/1419/index.cfm?go=site.home&sid=57&pid=497&lid=633&ctyp e=None&ptype=Contents

21 Skills Needs and Training Supply for Career Guidance – a Gap Analysis Prepared for LifelongLearning UK (LLUK) and UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES) by TBR, 21st July 2009.

Section 9

Recommendations

Overall

All our recommendations are underpinned by the requirement that Ofsted should provide ongoing monitoring into the quality of information, advice and guidance provision to ensure that the information and advice (especially the Labour Market Information (LMI)) being provided is accurate.

For young people:

+    A universal all age careers service which includes services for young people from 9+ so that they are able to make informed choices.

+    A statutory entitlement for young people in England to receive careers education as part of existing personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme of study.

+    Access to regular and impartial (not a one off) careers IAG in schools and colleges which is informed, age appropriate and supported by links to the existing curriculum. Careers awareness should be fed into the curriculum at key decision points and be supported and coordinated by professionally trained careers advisers and teachers.
For careers advisers:

+    Access to relevant resources including a central and comprehensive database of career options and qualification routes, so that careers advisers are able to support impartial and informed subject choices and career decisions post 14.

+    Implementation of the recommended priorities for action that emerged from the LLUK & UKCES report Skills Needs and Training Supply for Career Guidance – a Gap Analysis. (also see box 2).

For parents/carers:

+    Access to a universal all age careers service which provides parents/carers with specific information about subject and careers choices in order for them to provide informed careers advice.

For teachers:

+    Teachers must be familiar with the implications of subject choice on career choice; which is particularly relevant to science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM).
+    Demonstrable Government commitment is needed to STEM careers awareness being further integrated into relevant parts of the curriculum.

Dr Anil Kumar    Catherine Teague Director, Education and Skills    Senior Executive, Careers

The ETB acknowledges the support of our Careers Advisory Panel and Professor Tony Watts and Claire Nix for their input. If you have any comments related to this briefing please send them to: research@etechb.co.uk – The Engineering and Technology Board Weston House, 246 High Holborn, London. WC1V 7EX

Section 8

Box 2: Critical Timescales

At the time of writing this paper the planned DCSF IAG strategy (20) has been delayed until Autumn 2009; while this is disappointing it does provide a crucial opportunity for any implications of the current DCSF consultation into the impartiality of careers IAG in schools to be carefully considered. This is in addition to the QCA consultation regarding the statutory position of careers education as part of PSHE and the existing government plans for an adult advancement and careers service in England to be launched in 2010.

The ETB believes that in addition to these consultations, there needs to be a fast implementation of the recommended priorities for action that emerged from the LLUK & UKCES report Skills Needs and Training Supply for Career Guidance – a Gap Analysis (21).