<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Whom It May Concern &#8211; An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the &#8216;Digital Britain &#8211; Interim Report&#8217; Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/</link>
	<description>Updates, news and information about Write to Reply</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cyberdoyle</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberdoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-195</guid>
		<description>congrats to all who set up this site and the write to reply, it is brilliant and i hope that the powers that be appreciate your innovation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats to all who set up this site and the write to reply, it is brilliant and i hope that the powers that be appreciate your innovation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob McCardle</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob McCardle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-107</guid>
		<description>No to DRM, no to ISP snooping, no to Music Industry dabbling with my packets. No to restrictions on the free press via government intervention at an ISP level.

We will march through the streets of Shoreditch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No to DRM, no to ISP snooping, no to Music Industry dabbling with my packets. No to restrictions on the free press via government intervention at an ISP level.</p>
<p>We will march through the streets of Shoreditch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Frieslaar</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>John Frieslaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>As a starting point for discussion the Digital Britain document has the potential to underpin and drive the UK economy for a long time; and as such should take account of the fact that we need to consider the effects of this new infrastructure or service network over the next 20-25 years. The document is a little vague in content and does not capture the key issues that are driving the industry, such as virtualisation of services, the portability of services, the way in which the users of the service will want to interact with their data and content, the way that a new network or infrastructure has the potential to support other industries, and to develop a much greener Britain. The report needs to consider the needs of today’s business, the way we can guarantee high-bandwidth services are supported over time (we cannot go back to the same problem we currently face with copper and 2G wireless) and the needs of our future generations (those only starting their education now), how will they use the legacy infrastructure that will be 10-15 years old when they graduate and start to rely on the network to drive their future careers. There is a real need to understand how technologies can work together to enable Digital Britain, not to compete in a fashion that means someone needs to loose, currently I see it as a limited bag of money being wanted by many different technologies, all of which only serve a limited market and have questionable future evolution paths, surely we must work back from the future and determine the needs, not start with today’s technology and the need for USO and the driving factors. I would welcome this report being more service focused and future focused, with a large chunk of Green thinking as to how we could help UK plc become more sustainable through becoming Digital Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a starting point for discussion the Digital Britain document has the potential to underpin and drive the UK economy for a long time; and as such should take account of the fact that we need to consider the effects of this new infrastructure or service network over the next 20-25 years. The document is a little vague in content and does not capture the key issues that are driving the industry, such as virtualisation of services, the portability of services, the way in which the users of the service will want to interact with their data and content, the way that a new network or infrastructure has the potential to support other industries, and to develop a much greener Britain. The report needs to consider the needs of today’s business, the way we can guarantee high-bandwidth services are supported over time (we cannot go back to the same problem we currently face with copper and 2G wireless) and the needs of our future generations (those only starting their education now), how will they use the legacy infrastructure that will be 10-15 years old when they graduate and start to rely on the network to drive their future careers. There is a real need to understand how technologies can work together to enable Digital Britain, not to compete in a fashion that means someone needs to loose, currently I see it as a limited bag of money being wanted by many different technologies, all of which only serve a limited market and have questionable future evolution paths, surely we must work back from the future and determine the needs, not start with today’s technology and the need for USO and the driving factors. I would welcome this report being more service focused and future focused, with a large chunk of Green thinking as to how we could help UK plc become more sustainable through becoming Digital Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Banbury</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Banbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Stephen Carter&#039;s report does not mention &#039;Homeworking&#039; once. To my mind, that misses the key benefit to fast broadband access in the home.

Britain needs a general drive toward ‘efficiency’, in its effectiveness context. For example, homeworking means that people don’t waste time commuting, clog roads, overfill trains, get stressed (so ‘ill’) and waste fuel travelling to work. Family life will improve (crime benefit?), companies will save money through the need for smaller offices, essential transport speeds will improve etc etc etc. And all that hinges on people at home having better access and higher speeds from the net (or ‘grid’ as it will become). Its also predicated on bosses getting their minds round the outdated ‘If I cant see them they wont work’ or ‘We need to work together because otherwise communication and team spirit will fail’ nonsense. It links to the need for better digital and general education (which is mentioned in the report, and is a focus by the Conservative party) so that in the future we have smarter people, with better skills, to make the UK the world’s nation of choice for all services. The government needs to stimulate the economy, and spending money on traditional infrastructure might put cash out there, but how much better if its spent wisely on things that will provide us with a long term benefit applying a meaningful integrated strategy. Better roads might marginal help productivity, but transforming the UK into the best, most efficient services supplier is a far better long term solution. Maybe that way we’ll stave off long term financial demise…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Carter&#8217;s report does not mention &#8216;Homeworking&#8217; once. To my mind, that misses the key benefit to fast broadband access in the home.</p>
<p>Britain needs a general drive toward ‘efficiency’, in its effectiveness context. For example, homeworking means that people don’t waste time commuting, clog roads, overfill trains, get stressed (so ‘ill’) and waste fuel travelling to work. Family life will improve (crime benefit?), companies will save money through the need for smaller offices, essential transport speeds will improve etc etc etc. And all that hinges on people at home having better access and higher speeds from the net (or ‘grid’ as it will become). Its also predicated on bosses getting their minds round the outdated ‘If I cant see them they wont work’ or ‘We need to work together because otherwise communication and team spirit will fail’ nonsense. It links to the need for better digital and general education (which is mentioned in the report, and is a focus by the Conservative party) so that in the future we have smarter people, with better skills, to make the UK the world’s nation of choice for all services. The government needs to stimulate the economy, and spending money on traditional infrastructure might put cash out there, but how much better if its spent wisely on things that will provide us with a long term benefit applying a meaningful integrated strategy. Better roads might marginal help productivity, but transforming the UK into the best, most efficient services supplier is a far better long term solution. Maybe that way we’ll stave off long term financial demise…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josswinn (Joss Winn)</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>josswinn (Joss Winn)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Retweeting &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/writetoreply&quot;&gt;@writetoreply&lt;/a&gt;: An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain - Interim Report’ Team http://bit.ly/kbYt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retweeting <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/writetoreply">@writetoreply</a>: An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#8211; Interim Report’ Team <a href="http://bit.ly/kbYt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kbYt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faheyr (Richard Fahey)</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>faheyr (Richard Fahey)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-86</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/psychemedia&quot;&gt;@psychemedia&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/tom_watson&quot;&gt;@tom_watson&lt;/a&gt; FYI: To Whom It May Concern - An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#039;http://bit.ly/kbYt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/psychemedia">@psychemedia</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/tom_watson">@tom_watson</a> FYI: To Whom It May Concern &#8211; An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#8216;http://bit.ly/kbYt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychemedia (Tony Hirst)</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>psychemedia (Tony Hirst)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-87</guid>
		<description>&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/tom_watson&quot;&gt;@tom_watson&lt;/a&gt; FYI: To Whom It May Concern - An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain - Interim Report’ Team http://bit.ly/kbYt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/tom_watson">@tom_watson</a> FYI: To Whom It May Concern &#8211; An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#8211; Interim Report’ Team <a href="http://bit.ly/kbYt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kbYt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychemedia (Tony Hirst)</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>psychemedia (Tony Hirst)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-88</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/writetoreply&quot;&gt;@writetoreply&lt;/a&gt; To Whom It May Concern - An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain - Interim Report’ Team http://bit.ly/kbYt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/writetoreply">@writetoreply</a> To Whom It May Concern &#8211; An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#8211; Interim Report’ Team <a href="http://bit.ly/kbYt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kbYt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writetoreply (Write to Reply)</title>
		<link>http://writetoreply.org/actually/2009/02/06/an-open-letter-to-lord-carter/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>writetoreply (Write to Reply)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writetoreply.org/actually/?p=3#comment-89</guid>
		<description>To Whom It May Concern - An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain - Interim Report’ Team http://bit.ly/kbYt frm Write to Reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Whom It May Concern &#8211; An Open Letter to Lord Carter and the ‘Digital Britain &#8211; Interim Report’ Team <a href="http://bit.ly/kbYt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/kbYt</a> frm Write to Reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
